NEW Research: The Attacker-Defender Divide  
Download now >
Contact Us
Talk to an Expert
Request a demo

Are We Patching CVE-2020-0688 (the Microsoft Exchange RCE) Fast Enough?

Mar 13, 2020
Jonathan Cran

Share with Your Network

Last month, we analyzed progress versus the widely publicized ECC encryption vulnerability CVE-2020-0661 that was released in the January Microsoft Patch Tuesday announcement. Out of that analysis, it was clear that security teams were making remediation of the vulnerability a priority, with approximately 60% remediated within a month, well ahead of the norm. 

This month, we look at the patching behavior of another vulnerability, CVE-2020-0688, from the February batch. The vulnerability, a static cryptographic key in Microsoft Exchange Server’s on-by-default ECP control panel, is now being exploited in the wild by threat actors. Similar to the ECC vulnerability, both US-CERT and the NSA issued guidance urging teams to patch this vulnerability quickly. Just today, the MS-ISAC issued an advisory urging action in light of active exploitation in the wild. We currently have the vulnerability scored to the highest Kenna score: 100.  

Some Background About the Vulnerability 

On February 11, Microsoft announced a severe vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server as part of its monthly Patch Tuesday release. Initially, Microsoft labeled this a memory corruption vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange. But they later clarified that this is a static cryptographic key in an application running by default and exposed via :443 on Exchange servers. 

This is not the first example of this kind of vulnerability, though it’s certainly one of the most high profile. IoT devices are commonly (and accidentally) shipped with a key, but it’s rare for software of this profile to have this kind of vulnerability. This post will not discuss the vulnerability specifics in depth, it’s been covered by others. The Trend Micro Zero Day initiative’s (ZDI) detailed description of the vulnerability on Feb 24th that summarizes it nicely:

The nature of the bug is quite simple. Instead of having randomly-generated keys on a per-installation basis, all installations of Microsoft Exchange Server have the same validationKey and decryptionKey values in web.config. These keys are used to provide security for ViewState. ViewState is server-side data that ASP.NET web applications store in serialized format on the client. The client provides this data back to the server via the __VIEWSTATE request parameter.

Exploitation is quite simple as well, given that the vulnerable component, Exchange Control Panel (ECP) is on by default. A single valid credential – including those with no significant privileges – is required to exploit the vulnerability

An exploit is available in Metasploit. The vulnerability is actively being exploited in the wild, as reported by Volexity on March 6. If your organization has not yet patched, you’re going to want to patch or disable ECP as quickly as possible. Check the server for IoCs, and, if you suspect it’s compromised, reset all passwords for your users. A compromise of your Exchange server is effectively a compromise of your Active Directory.

How Remediation Teams Are Progressing With Patching

In order to understand how remediation teams were doing against this critical vulnerability, we pulled a representative sample of remediation data, giving us the rate of open vs closed instances of the vulnerability. This was not encouraging. The vulnerability is currently less than 15% remediated.

Given that we’re about a month out from the original announcement, we should be closer to 50%, according to the norm for Microsoft-sourced vulnerabilities as reported in the Prioritization to Prediction v3 report. Unfortunately, that’s simply not the case here. 

Perhaps these servers aren’t directly exposed to the internet. Or, maybe users have worked around and disabled ECP. Or, perhaps they operate on an email domain that doesn’t have as much exposure to phishing or other credential leaks. 

So, given the risk of this vulnerability, we decided to take a deeper look. Working with the team at BinaryEdge – who were kind enough to assist with an export of all internet facing Outlook Web Access (OWA) servers in their Internet-wide scan data – we collected 220,000 publicly exposed OWA servers – presumably everything on the Internet. 

Since we wanted the underlying Exchange server, and knowing that OWA exposes the build number, we fired up Intrigue Ident, an open source fingerprinting library that accurately infers Microsoft Exchange versions from OWA. Approximately eight hours later, we received the following result: 

As evidenced by this data, and as might be expected due to the unique nature of Exchange servers as a crucial hard-to-patch and hard-to-upgrade system, the installed versions are all over the place. Breaking it down by base version, you can see the bulk of the installs are 2016 versions. 

How many of these are vulnerable? Using the inferred information – we can’t be 100% accurate since there’s no clear indicator that the patch was applied. But, based on the underlying version, we can label as either “vulnerable” or “potentially vulnerable. ”After doing this labeling, we got the result: 74% vulnerable and 26% potentially vulnerable. This falls in line with the first analysis and is not particularly encouraging.  

The Bottom Line

In most Microsoft-centric organizations, Exchange is a critical organization service, and thus, may be off-limits for normal monthly patching schedules. This fact, combined with the fact that the vulnerability exposes SYSTEM access on the server, and the fact that exchange stores credentials in memory in plain text, make this an incredibly attractive target. 

Yes, this vulnerability requires a first credential, but if you do some quick searching in one of the breach databases like Dehashed or Spycloud, you’ll quickly see this isn’t a barrier at all. It’s reasonable to assume that there’s at least one working credential for any given enterprise available with minimal effort at any given time. 

Attackers are effectively one weak or leaked user password away from complete access to your organization. When combined with the external facing nature of OWA and the ECP – on by default in Exchange, this is likely to be one of the most devastating vulnerabilities of 2020.

So What Can You Do?

Drop everything and patch this vulnerability immediately. At present, this vulnerability presents more risk than most other vulnerabilities in the enterprise environment. If patching simply isn’t possible, block access to ECP. Ultimately, vulnerabilities like these make a strong case for upgrading to Office 365. 

Looking for a better way to remediate? Risk-based vulnerability management is your answer. Get a demo today.

Share with Your Network

Read the Latest Content

Research Reports

Prioritization to Prediction Volume 5: In Search of Assets at Risk

The fifth volume of the Prioritization to Prediction series produced in conjunction with the Cyentia Institute explores the vulnerability risk landscape by looking at how enterprises often view vulnerabilities: through the lens of common asset platforms. Download the research report to learn more about the key findings: Common asset platforms and their typical risk profiles…


5 Things Every CIO Should Know About Vulnerability Management

If you view vulnerability management (VM) as just a small part of your operation, it might be time to take another look.  Managing vulnerabilities is just as critical to IT as it is to Security and DevOps.  And it’s worth getting right: Vulnerabilities can leave your most strategic assets—and your business itself—exposed to cyber threats…




Get Started Using the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS).

Cyentia Institute’s Chief Data Scientist and Founder Jay Jacobs gives tips on how to get started using the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS). You can learn more about the Exploit Prediction Scoring System and use the interactive calculator here:…


© 2020 Kenna Security. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.